Welcome to the sixth installment of Picking Up Pennies. Last month, we discussed reducing how often we trade by constructing holistic portfolios with fewer funds and not auto-reinvesting the dividends from those funds. We want to control trading and use the dividends to rebalance the portfolio as needed. Reducing trading reduces trading costs and taxes owed. Although trading often realizes taxes, there are methods of reducing taxes when you trade. This month, we will discuss how we minimize taxes when we trade and why we sometimes trade intentionally to reduce your tax burden.

•   Volume 1 – Keep Cash Balances Low (Better Chance for Higher Returns)
•   Volume 2 – Asset Location (Reduces Taxes)
•   Volume 3 – Using ETFs  (Reduces Taxes)
•   Volume 4 – Trading ETFs in Competition (Reduces Trading Costs)
•   Volume 5 – Number of Funds and Not Auto-Reinvesting Dividends (Reduces Trading Costs)
•   Volume 6 – Tax Lots and Tax Loss Harvesting (Reduces Taxes)
•   Volume 7 – Summary (Total Impact)

Tax Lots

Whenever you sell an investment, you hold the power to decide which “tax lot” to sell. A tax lot refers to a specific security purchase at a particular price and time. If you bought one share of Apple stock yearly for ten years, you would have ten different tax lots for Apple. One lot for each time you bought Apple. Each year, when you buy Apple, you buy the stock at a different price. This means that the gain and subsequent tax bill for each share of Apple will be different. When you sell one of those ten shares of Apple you own, you have the authority to decide which share of Apple to sell, as each one has a different tax consequence.

The default at most custodians/investment platforms is First-in-First-out (FIFO). When you sell one share, they assume you will want to sell the oldest share you bought. Often, this is not a tax-optimal strategy. Instead, the optimal approach is to choose the share with the lowest tax burden.

Figuring out which lot has the lowest tax burden is not always straightforward. You need to factor in things like wash sales and long vs short-term capital gain treatment. While we will not dive deep into capital gain tax law in this post,  rest assured, whenever we trade, we analyze the tax burden of every lot across every investment you have to minimize the tax impact to you. This allows you to keep more of your invested money and earn a higher after-tax return.

Tax Loss Harvesting

Another key advantage of focusing on individual tax lots is that it allows us to implement tax loss harvesting effectively. Tax loss harvesting involves strategically selling investments that have experienced losses. Since trading is costly, we are generally not searching for trades to place daily. We believe in taking the long view and holding diversified low-cost investments. However, every day, we look at every tax lot in your portfolio for opportunities to harvest losses. By selling individual tax lots at a loss, we can create and bank a tax asset for you: a tax loss. These losses can offset gains from other trades, allow us to rebalance the portfolio without a tax hit, or offset up to $3,000 of income each year. This strategy allows us to reduce your tax bill and realign your portfolio toward your long-term investment objectives.

Whenever we sell a position for tax loss harvesting, we immediately buy a different approved investment to ensure that you remain fully invested as your Investment Policy Statement would direct. We don’t want you to miss out on market returns to realize a tax loss. Most of the time, we will buy a security with a similar exposure to what we just sold to avoid “wash sale” rules, which, if violated, would negate the benefit of creating the loss in the first place. However, that is not always the case. We don’t want a blind tax loss harvesting strategy that does the same thing for everyone. We want to buy whatever asset class is the most underweight. Thus, each client and their situation will be treated uniquely based on their circumstances.

 We optimize our trading based on prior considerations and consultation with each client’s tax advisor so that we know and understand the parameters we should trade in. Further, by leveraging the insights gained from examining individual tax lots and implementing tax loss harvesting, investors can navigate the complexities of the tax landscape while maximizing their after-tax investment returns. We’re committed to treating each client uniquely and executing this strategy daily to pick up as many pennies as possible for our clients.

This information is educational and does not intend to make an offer for the sale of any specific securities, investments, or strategies.  Investments involve risk and, past performance is not indicative of future performance. Return will be reduced by advisory fees and any other expenses incurred in the management of a client’s account. Consult with a qualified financial adviser before implementing any investment strategy.

Welcome to the fifth installment of picking up pennies. Last month, we discussed how we trade ETFs by putting our trades in competition to improve the price we buy and sell ETFs for. Although we minimize trading costs, it still costs money to trade. Thus, we want to minimize how often we trade. We only want to trade when it is economically meaningful. This month, we will discuss how we minimize trading by selecting the ETFs we invest in and how we reinvest dividends.

•   Volume 1 – Keep Cash Balances Low (Better Chance for Higher Returns)
•   Volume 2 – Asset Location (Reduces Taxes)
•   Volume 3 – Using ETFs (Reduces Taxes)
•   Volume 4 – Trading ETFs in Competition (Reduces Trading Costs)
•   Volume 5 – Number of Funds and Not Auto-Reinvesting Dividends (Reduces Trading Costs)
•   Volume 6 – Tax Lots and Tax Loss Harvesting (Reduces Taxes)
•   Volume 7 – Summary (Total Impact)

ETFs We Use

The US investment universe has over 3,000 different investment companies. To help investors simplify and organize this vast universe, we generally split stocks into four categories: large, small, growth, and value.

Investment advisors will want to ensure they have some allocation to each of these four asset classes. They will try to find “the best” manager in each category. We could take a similar approach and find the best evidence-based fund in each category, but we take a more nuanced approach.

The world, and the publicly traded companies in it, is not a static place. Stocks often change which category they are in. For example, a small-value company may have significant success with a new product and quickly become a large-growth company. When this happens, a small-value fund, if it follows the fund’s Investment Policy Statement promised to investors, would need to sell that stock, and a large-growth fund would need to buy that stock. Thus, if we were like many investors, the two funds we own in aggregate would buy and sell the same stock and incur trading costs. Is that helpful? No!

This is why HIG uses market-wide solutions in our client portfolios. We use one fund that buys stocks in all four categories. This is beneficial for multiple reasons.

First, the ETF won’t buy and sell the same stock as it moves among various categories. On average, funds that only invest in one category have an annual turnover of around 25%, meaning that fully one-quarter of the holdings held on January 1 are sold by December 31 of that year. A market-wide fund has only about 5% turnover per year. Therefore, by investing in one fund instead of four, we cut the amount of trading down by 80% with the same net economic exposure. The same securities are held with less trading costs. 

Second, a market-wide fund reduces the need to rebalance the portfolio. Ultimately, we want to invest a certain amount of money in each category. The all-in-one ETF maintains those percentages without the need for additional turnover. However, if you use four funds individually, those amounts will shift over time. You may want 25% in each category, but due to performance differences, you may end up with 35% in one category and 15% in another. Over time, you must sell one fund and buy another to get them back in balance. This will result in trading costs and incur capital gains, increasing your tax bill.

On the face of it, using more funds sounds better than using fewer funds. However, less is more when you invest in the correct funds and understand the details. Less trading, fewer taxes, and more money in your pocket. 

Reinvesting Dividends

 Another way we save on trading is how we handle dividends. Every investment (ETFs, Mutual Funds, Stocks) produces dividends. Dividends are simply cash paid to an investor and represent a portion of the return you earn on any investment. Most advisors and investors elect to reinvest the dividends automatically. This means if you own ETF ABC, and it pays a $10 dividend, you will automatically turn around and buy $10 more of ABC. This is an easy way for investors to “set it and forget it.” However, this approach, although easy, is not optimal for investors. Why?

First, when you reinvest dividends, you need to go to the market and buy more shares of the ETF. The custodians that automatically reinvest dividends do not care about execution prices. They want to get the cash spent. They usually execute these trades early the following morning when spreads and trading costs are highest. As we talked about last month, trading ETFs can be costly when you don’t put them in competition. Thus, automatically reinvesting dividends usually results in higher trading costs. 

Second, we want to invest the extra cash in the asset class that you are underweight. Not the asset class that just paid you money. We want to examine your overall portfolio and determine if you need more stock, fixed income, or US or international exposure. By constantly investing the dividends in the most underweight asset class, we reduce the rebalancing needed in the portfolio over time. This reduces trading costs and taxes. Yes, it means that every quarter, when every ETF pays a dividend, we must go into every account and spend that cash. We do it because this approach improves investor outcomes with better trade execution and lower taxes over time.

This information is educational and does not intend to make an offer for the sale of any specific securities, investments, or strategies.  Investments involve risk and, past performance is not indicative of future performance. Return will be reduced by advisory fees and any other expenses incurred in the management of a client’s account. Consult with a qualified financial adviser before implementing any investment strategy.

Clients and long-time followers already know one year of performance is really a nano-second of investing time. However, it’s instructive to look back on 2023 to see what happened in that snapshot of time. The US stock market was up 26.1%¹ for the year. Not bad. If you invested $1,000,000 in the US market on January 1st, 2023, fell asleep, and woke up on January 1st, 2024, your account would have a value of $1,261,000. This would have been quite a pleasant surprise to wake up to. However, if you checked your account every month, your experience (mental and financial) was very different. Your portfolio would have lost value in February, August, September, and October. One-third of the months, you would have been frustrated with the returns. From August through October, your portfolio would been down 9.1%! Seeing $1,000,000 fall to $909,000 in a short three-month period may have freaked you out. In October, we got a few calls from newer clients worried about the market and wondering if we should take action.

Then November and December happened. The market ended up returning 15.2% over those two months. 58% of the gain for the year occurred in November and December. If you had sold after the 9.1% market decline, you would have missed over half the entire market premium for the year. Bouncing in and out of the market is a loser’s game. Let me repeat: bouncing in and out of the market is a loser’s game. Staying committed to the long view is a winning strategy over time.

The market behaves unpredictably every year, but two things remain true. First, markets are volatile and can go up and down very quickly. Second, investors are compensated with higher returns by staying invested in the market and observing the risk of volatile equity markets.

Keep in mind that even a one-year time frame is a short period. Equity markets can underperform short-term government bonds for over a decade. Taking the long view means not just staying invested for months or even years, but throughout an investment lifetime.

This information is educational and does not intend to make an offer for the sale of any specific securities, investments, or strategies.  Investments involve risk and, past performance is not indicative of future performance. Return will be reduced by advisory fees and any other expenses incurred in the management of a client’s account. Consult with a qualified financial adviser before implementing any investment strategy