Welcome to the fifth installment of picking up pennies. Last month, we discussed how we trade ETFs by putting our trades in competition to improve the price we buy and sell ETFs for. Although we minimize trading costs, it still costs money to trade. Thus, we want to minimize how often we trade. We only want to trade when it is economically meaningful. This month, we will discuss how we minimize trading by selecting the ETFs we invest in and how we reinvest dividends.

•   Volume 1 – Keep Cash Balances Low (Better Chance for Higher Returns)
•   Volume 2 – Asset Location (Reduces Taxes)
•   Volume 3 – Using ETFs (Reduces Taxes)
•   Volume 4 – Trading ETFs in Competition (Reduces Trading Costs)
•   Volume 5 – Number of Funds and Not Auto-Reinvesting Dividends (Reduces Trading Costs)
•   Volume 6 – Tax Lots and Tax Loss Harvesting (Reduces Taxes)
•   Volume 7 – Summary (Total Impact)

ETFs We Use

The US investment universe has over 3,000 different investment companies. To help investors simplify and organize this vast universe, we generally split stocks into four categories: large, small, growth, and value.

Investment advisors will want to ensure they have some allocation to each of these four asset classes. They will try to find “the best” manager in each category. We could take a similar approach and find the best evidence-based fund in each category, but we take a more nuanced approach.

The world, and the publicly traded companies in it, is not a static place. Stocks often change which category they are in. For example, a small-value company may have significant success with a new product and quickly become a large-growth company. When this happens, a small-value fund, if it follows the fund’s Investment Policy Statement promised to investors, would need to sell that stock, and a large-growth fund would need to buy that stock. Thus, if we were like many investors, the two funds we own in aggregate would buy and sell the same stock and incur trading costs. Is that helpful? No!

This is why HIG uses market-wide solutions in our client portfolios. We use one fund that buys stocks in all four categories. This is beneficial for multiple reasons.

First, the ETF won’t buy and sell the same stock as it moves among various categories. On average, funds that only invest in one category have an annual turnover of around 25%, meaning that fully one-quarter of the holdings held on January 1 are sold by December 31 of that year. A market-wide fund has only about 5% turnover per year. Therefore, by investing in one fund instead of four, we cut the amount of trading down by 80% with the same net economic exposure. The same securities are held with less trading costs. 

Second, a market-wide fund reduces the need to rebalance the portfolio. Ultimately, we want to invest a certain amount of money in each category. The all-in-one ETF maintains those percentages without the need for additional turnover. However, if you use four funds individually, those amounts will shift over time. You may want 25% in each category, but due to performance differences, you may end up with 35% in one category and 15% in another. Over time, you must sell one fund and buy another to get them back in balance. This will result in trading costs and incur capital gains, increasing your tax bill.

On the face of it, using more funds sounds better than using fewer funds. However, less is more when you invest in the correct funds and understand the details. Less trading, fewer taxes, and more money in your pocket. 

Reinvesting Dividends

 Another way we save on trading is how we handle dividends. Every investment (ETFs, Mutual Funds, Stocks) produces dividends. Dividends are simply cash paid to an investor and represent a portion of the return you earn on any investment. Most advisors and investors elect to reinvest the dividends automatically. This means if you own ETF ABC, and it pays a $10 dividend, you will automatically turn around and buy $10 more of ABC. This is an easy way for investors to “set it and forget it.” However, this approach, although easy, is not optimal for investors. Why?

First, when you reinvest dividends, you need to go to the market and buy more shares of the ETF. The custodians that automatically reinvest dividends do not care about execution prices. They want to get the cash spent. They usually execute these trades early the following morning when spreads and trading costs are highest. As we talked about last month, trading ETFs can be costly when you don’t put them in competition. Thus, automatically reinvesting dividends usually results in higher trading costs. 

Second, we want to invest the extra cash in the asset class that you are underweight. Not the asset class that just paid you money. We want to examine your overall portfolio and determine if you need more stock, fixed income, or US or international exposure. By constantly investing the dividends in the most underweight asset class, we reduce the rebalancing needed in the portfolio over time. This reduces trading costs and taxes. Yes, it means that every quarter, when every ETF pays a dividend, we must go into every account and spend that cash. We do it because this approach improves investor outcomes with better trade execution and lower taxes over time.

This information is educational and does not intend to make an offer for the sale of any specific securities, investments, or strategies.  Investments involve risk and, past performance is not indicative of future performance. Return will be reduced by advisory fees and any other expenses incurred in the management of a client’s account. Consult with a qualified financial adviser before implementing any investment strategy.

Clients and long-time followers already know one year of performance is really a nano-second of investing time. However, it’s instructive to look back on 2023 to see what happened in that snapshot of time. The US stock market was up 26.1%¹ for the year. Not bad. If you invested $1,000,000 in the US market on January 1st, 2023, fell asleep, and woke up on January 1st, 2024, your account would have a value of $1,261,000. This would have been quite a pleasant surprise to wake up to. However, if you checked your account every month, your experience (mental and financial) was very different. Your portfolio would have lost value in February, August, September, and October. One-third of the months, you would have been frustrated with the returns. From August through October, your portfolio would been down 9.1%! Seeing $1,000,000 fall to $909,000 in a short three-month period may have freaked you out. In October, we got a few calls from newer clients worried about the market and wondering if we should take action.

Then November and December happened. The market ended up returning 15.2% over those two months. 58% of the gain for the year occurred in November and December. If you had sold after the 9.1% market decline, you would have missed over half the entire market premium for the year. Bouncing in and out of the market is a loser’s game. Let me repeat: bouncing in and out of the market is a loser’s game. Staying committed to the long view is a winning strategy over time.

The market behaves unpredictably every year, but two things remain true. First, markets are volatile and can go up and down very quickly. Second, investors are compensated with higher returns by staying invested in the market and observing the risk of volatile equity markets.

Keep in mind that even a one-year time frame is a short period. Equity markets can underperform short-term government bonds for over a decade. Taking the long view means not just staying invested for months or even years, but throughout an investment lifetime.

This information is educational and does not intend to make an offer for the sale of any specific securities, investments, or strategies.  Investments involve risk and, past performance is not indicative of future performance. Return will be reduced by advisory fees and any other expenses incurred in the management of a client’s account. Consult with a qualified financial adviser before implementing any investment strategy

Welcome to the fourth installment of picking up pennies. Last month, we discussed what an Exchange Traded Fund (ETF) is and how its structure can help investors defer capital gains, defer taxes, and keep money invested in the market rather than giving it to Uncle Sam. This month, we’ll discuss how to save on trading costs when buying and selling ETFs.

•   Volume 1 – Keep Cash Balances Low (Better Chance for Higher Returns)
•   Volume 2 – Asset Location (Reduces Taxes)
•   Volume 3 – Using ETFs (Reduces Taxes)
•   Volume 4 – Trading ETFs in Competition (Reduces Trading Costs)
•   Volume 5 – Number of Funds and Not Auto-Reinvesting Dividends (Reduces Trading Costs)
•   Volume 6 – Tax Lots and Tax Loss Harvesting (Reduces Taxes)
•   Volume 7 – Summary (Total Impact)

How do ETFs Trade? 

ETFs are like stocks in that they are traded throughout the day while the market is open. To buy or sell a share of an ETF, you need to find another investor to trade with. Let’s say it is 1:00 pm, and you want to sell a share of ETF ABC. At that exact time, there may not be anyone willing to buy a share of ABC. Maybe in a few hours, or tomorrow there might be, but you want to sell the share today. This is where market makers come in who will buy your share of ABC and hold it on their books until someone else wants to buy it from them. The market maker is taking a risk by holding on to ABC. What if the price goes down between the time they buy it from you and sell it to someone else?

Because these market makers need to be compensated for the risk they are taking and the service they are providing, they are compensated via a bid-ask spread. A bid-ask spread is the difference between the highest price a buyer is willing to pay for an asset and the lowest price a seller is willing to accept. If an ETF is worth $10, these market makers might be willing to buy ABC for $9.99 and sell it for $10.01. In other words, buy it from you now for $9.99 and sell it a few hours later for $10.01. Market makers pocket the 2 cents between the two prices, i.e., they earn 2 cents on “the spread.”. The cost to you is the 1 cent/share less you received for selling the ETF for less than it was worth, but you had the benefit of selling it immediately. Importantly, this cost is not listed anywhere on your statements. It is simply built into the price you bought or sold the ETF for.

The risk to the market maker goes up the more shares you are trying to trade. Thus, market makers might be willing to buy 100 shares at $9.99, but the next 100 shares will be at $9.98, the next hundred at $9.97, etc. The trading cost to you keeps getting steeper and steeper the more shares you want to trade. These trades can get costly if you are not paying attention and are trading blindly. Is there a better way?

Putting ETFs in Competition

If HIG wanted to trade 1,000 shares of ABC and sent a typical order to sell 1,000 shares to the market, we would end up paying a steep cost. We might be able to get a few hundred shares traded at $9.99, but the next few hundred might be sold at $9.98 or less. This means it could cost our clients over $10 in hidden trade costs (at least 1 cent per share X 1,000 shares). How can an investor minimize these costs?

Investors can minimize these costs by putting their trades in competition rather than sending them blindly to the market. We don’t go to the market and just take the quotes that market makers have posted and incur these costs. Whenever we can, we put all the market makers in competition with each other and make them compete for our business on your behalf. We call up all the market makers and tell them we want to trade 1,000 shares of ABC. We don’t tell them if we are buying or selling and ask them to quote us their best price. By putting these market makers in competition, we squeeze their margins and improve the price our clients can receive on their trades.

Let’s take an example. On October 25th, we wanted to sell 14,000 shares of AVIG in a client account. At the time of the trade, the bid-ask spread was 200 shares deep at $38.67 x $38.72. That means we could have sold 200 shares for $38.67 or bought 200 shares for $38.72. Given that we wanted to sell 14,000 shares, not 200, we probably would have sold the shares for an average price much lower than $38.67. Rather than just sending the trade to the market, we put the market makers in competition and got quoted $38.69 for all 14,000 shares. That is two cents per share better than the quoted bid-ask spread! That means we saved at least $280 on this trade for this client.

Saving 1-2 cents per share you trade doesn’t sound all that meaningful. But as soon as you realize we are trading millions of shares, costs escalate quickly. We care about these costs, even if they don’t appear on a statement. Our clients only see that we sold AVIG for $38.69/share rather than $38.67/share. Clients don’t know we saved them $280 in hidden trading costs on this trade. As background, it’s estimated that less than 20% of financial advisors take the time to put their clients’ ETF trades in competition to reduce these hidden costs. In 2023, we traded ~$9 million shares of ETFs in our client accounts. Assuming we saved ~$0.02/share on average by trading via competition, that is $180,000 in savings. Now you know!