Welcome to the final installment of Picking Up Pennies. Last month, we discussed how understanding the concept of tax lots can optimize an investor’s tax consequences and even create a tax asset via active tax loss harvesting. Over the last six months, we have discussed different strategies we employ to increase returns, reduce costs, and minimize taxes. This final article will summarize the impact of these small decisions on your investment portfolio.

•   Volume 1 – Keep Cash Balances Low (Better Chance for Higher Returns)
•   Volume 2 – Asset Location (Reduces Taxes)
•   Volume 3 – Using ETFs (Reduces Taxes)
•   Volume 4 – Trading ETFs in Competition (Reduces Trading Costs)
•   Volume 5 – Number of Funds and Not Auto-Reinvesting Dividends (Reduces Trading Costs)
•   Volume 6 – Tax Lots and Tax Loss Harvesting (Reduces Taxes)
•   Volume 7 – Summary (Total Impact)

Determining the exact impact of each decision is difficult as each strategy will impact every investor differently. For this analysis, we used what we think is a typical investor.

–   Allocation is 60% Stocks and 40% Bonds

–   Half of the money is in a taxable account, half is in an IRA

–   Portfolio turnover is 10%/year

–   25% income tax rate, 15% capital gains tax rate

While the impact of some strategies may be more pronounced than others, it’s important to remember that every penny counts. When you add up all these strategies, you’ll see a significant difference in your investment outcomes. Specifically, about 0.59% per year or 59 basis points in financial industry jargon, which we prefer to avoid. Remember, all else being equal, the higher your tax rate, the more significant your net savings.  

As discussed throughout the series, implementing these strategies is more than a one-size-fits-all approach. Each investor and family is unique, and tailoring these strategies to your needs takes time and effort. Our personalized approach is a testament to our commitment to your financial success.

In the first installment, I mentioned that I often ask other money managers how they implement these solutions. Most of the time, the response is, “We are not doing X because… it is too much work, clients don’t know the difference, the benefit is small, etc.” All of these answers are correct except one. It does take a lot of work…clients don’t normally notice the difference…but the benefit is NOT small. When you add all this up, it makes a meaningful difference. As your fiduciary, our obligation is to seek the best solutions we can find for our clients…no matter what.

These benefits are all the small details in your investment implementation. This series does not even include the bigger items that add even more value, like asset allocation, quarterly rebalancing, behavioral coaching, spending strategy, and a low-fee diversified investing strategy. Add it all together and compound these advantages over time, and now you’ve got something to be proud of now and in the long view!

1 Assumes the average investor holds 8% cash across uninvested cash and cash held in funds (5% + 3%). HIG holds 1% cash (0.7% + 0.3%). 60/40 portfolio returns 4% above cash. Impact = 30 bps

2 Assumes 5% bond returns and 10% equity returns. Impact = 20 bps

3 Assumes 3% annual capital gain distributions. Impact = 5 bps

4 Assumes savings of 2 cents per share traded. Impact = 1 bp

5 Assumes 20% additional fund turnover. 0.1% round-trip trading costs. Impact = 2 bps

6 Assumes 4% distributions and 0.1% higher trading costs. Impact = 1 bp

7 Tax benefits would depend on specific market conditions. Impact assumed to be zero for this analysis.

Welcome to the sixth installment of Picking Up Pennies. Last month, we discussed reducing how often we trade by constructing holistic portfolios with fewer funds and not auto-reinvesting the dividends from those funds. We want to control trading and use the dividends to rebalance the portfolio as needed. Reducing trading reduces trading costs and taxes owed. Although trading often realizes taxes, there are methods of reducing taxes when you trade. This month, we will discuss how we minimize taxes when we trade and why we sometimes trade intentionally to reduce your tax burden.

•   Volume 1 – Keep Cash Balances Low (Better Chance for Higher Returns)
•   Volume 2 – Asset Location (Reduces Taxes)
•   Volume 3 – Using ETFs  (Reduces Taxes)
•   Volume 4 – Trading ETFs in Competition (Reduces Trading Costs)
•   Volume 5 – Number of Funds and Not Auto-Reinvesting Dividends (Reduces Trading Costs)
•   Volume 6 – Tax Lots and Tax Loss Harvesting (Reduces Taxes)
•   Volume 7 – Summary (Total Impact)

Tax Lots

Whenever you sell an investment, you hold the power to decide which “tax lot” to sell. A tax lot refers to a specific security purchase at a particular price and time. If you bought one share of Apple stock yearly for ten years, you would have ten different tax lots for Apple. One lot for each time you bought Apple. Each year, when you buy Apple, you buy the stock at a different price. This means that the gain and subsequent tax bill for each share of Apple will be different. When you sell one of those ten shares of Apple you own, you have the authority to decide which share of Apple to sell, as each one has a different tax consequence.

The default at most custodians/investment platforms is First-in-First-out (FIFO). When you sell one share, they assume you will want to sell the oldest share you bought. Often, this is not a tax-optimal strategy. Instead, the optimal approach is to choose the share with the lowest tax burden.

Figuring out which lot has the lowest tax burden is not always straightforward. You need to factor in things like wash sales and long vs short-term capital gain treatment. While we will not dive deep into capital gain tax law in this post,  rest assured, whenever we trade, we analyze the tax burden of every lot across every investment you have to minimize the tax impact to you. This allows you to keep more of your invested money and earn a higher after-tax return.

Tax Loss Harvesting

Another key advantage of focusing on individual tax lots is that it allows us to implement tax loss harvesting effectively. Tax loss harvesting involves strategically selling investments that have experienced losses. Since trading is costly, we are generally not searching for trades to place daily. We believe in taking the long view and holding diversified low-cost investments. However, every day, we look at every tax lot in your portfolio for opportunities to harvest losses. By selling individual tax lots at a loss, we can create and bank a tax asset for you: a tax loss. These losses can offset gains from other trades, allow us to rebalance the portfolio without a tax hit, or offset up to $3,000 of income each year. This strategy allows us to reduce your tax bill and realign your portfolio toward your long-term investment objectives.

Whenever we sell a position for tax loss harvesting, we immediately buy a different approved investment to ensure that you remain fully invested as your Investment Policy Statement would direct. We don’t want you to miss out on market returns to realize a tax loss. Most of the time, we will buy a security with a similar exposure to what we just sold to avoid “wash sale” rules, which, if violated, would negate the benefit of creating the loss in the first place. However, that is not always the case. We don’t want a blind tax loss harvesting strategy that does the same thing for everyone. We want to buy whatever asset class is the most underweight. Thus, each client and their situation will be treated uniquely based on their circumstances.

 We optimize our trading based on prior considerations and consultation with each client’s tax advisor so that we know and understand the parameters we should trade in. Further, by leveraging the insights gained from examining individual tax lots and implementing tax loss harvesting, investors can navigate the complexities of the tax landscape while maximizing their after-tax investment returns. We’re committed to treating each client uniquely and executing this strategy daily to pick up as many pennies as possible for our clients.

This information is educational and does not intend to make an offer for the sale of any specific securities, investments, or strategies.  Investments involve risk and, past performance is not indicative of future performance. Return will be reduced by advisory fees and any other expenses incurred in the management of a client’s account. Consult with a qualified financial adviser before implementing any investment strategy.

Welcome to the fifth installment of picking up pennies. Last month, we discussed how we trade ETFs by putting our trades in competition to improve the price we buy and sell ETFs for. Although we minimize trading costs, it still costs money to trade. Thus, we want to minimize how often we trade. We only want to trade when it is economically meaningful. This month, we will discuss how we minimize trading by selecting the ETFs we invest in and how we reinvest dividends.

•   Volume 1 – Keep Cash Balances Low (Better Chance for Higher Returns)
•   Volume 2 – Asset Location (Reduces Taxes)
•   Volume 3 – Using ETFs (Reduces Taxes)
•   Volume 4 – Trading ETFs in Competition (Reduces Trading Costs)
•   Volume 5 – Number of Funds and Not Auto-Reinvesting Dividends (Reduces Trading Costs)
•   Volume 6 – Tax Lots and Tax Loss Harvesting (Reduces Taxes)
•   Volume 7 – Summary (Total Impact)

ETFs We Use

The US investment universe has over 3,000 different investment companies. To help investors simplify and organize this vast universe, we generally split stocks into four categories: large, small, growth, and value.

Investment advisors will want to ensure they have some allocation to each of these four asset classes. They will try to find “the best” manager in each category. We could take a similar approach and find the best evidence-based fund in each category, but we take a more nuanced approach.

The world, and the publicly traded companies in it, is not a static place. Stocks often change which category they are in. For example, a small-value company may have significant success with a new product and quickly become a large-growth company. When this happens, a small-value fund, if it follows the fund’s Investment Policy Statement promised to investors, would need to sell that stock, and a large-growth fund would need to buy that stock. Thus, if we were like many investors, the two funds we own in aggregate would buy and sell the same stock and incur trading costs. Is that helpful? No!

This is why HIG uses market-wide solutions in our client portfolios. We use one fund that buys stocks in all four categories. This is beneficial for multiple reasons.

First, the ETF won’t buy and sell the same stock as it moves among various categories. On average, funds that only invest in one category have an annual turnover of around 25%, meaning that fully one-quarter of the holdings held on January 1 are sold by December 31 of that year. A market-wide fund has only about 5% turnover per year. Therefore, by investing in one fund instead of four, we cut the amount of trading down by 80% with the same net economic exposure. The same securities are held with less trading costs. 

Second, a market-wide fund reduces the need to rebalance the portfolio. Ultimately, we want to invest a certain amount of money in each category. The all-in-one ETF maintains those percentages without the need for additional turnover. However, if you use four funds individually, those amounts will shift over time. You may want 25% in each category, but due to performance differences, you may end up with 35% in one category and 15% in another. Over time, you must sell one fund and buy another to get them back in balance. This will result in trading costs and incur capital gains, increasing your tax bill.

On the face of it, using more funds sounds better than using fewer funds. However, less is more when you invest in the correct funds and understand the details. Less trading, fewer taxes, and more money in your pocket. 

Reinvesting Dividends

 Another way we save on trading is how we handle dividends. Every investment (ETFs, Mutual Funds, Stocks) produces dividends. Dividends are simply cash paid to an investor and represent a portion of the return you earn on any investment. Most advisors and investors elect to reinvest the dividends automatically. This means if you own ETF ABC, and it pays a $10 dividend, you will automatically turn around and buy $10 more of ABC. This is an easy way for investors to “set it and forget it.” However, this approach, although easy, is not optimal for investors. Why?

First, when you reinvest dividends, you need to go to the market and buy more shares of the ETF. The custodians that automatically reinvest dividends do not care about execution prices. They want to get the cash spent. They usually execute these trades early the following morning when spreads and trading costs are highest. As we talked about last month, trading ETFs can be costly when you don’t put them in competition. Thus, automatically reinvesting dividends usually results in higher trading costs. 

Second, we want to invest the extra cash in the asset class that you are underweight. Not the asset class that just paid you money. We want to examine your overall portfolio and determine if you need more stock, fixed income, or US or international exposure. By constantly investing the dividends in the most underweight asset class, we reduce the rebalancing needed in the portfolio over time. This reduces trading costs and taxes. Yes, it means that every quarter, when every ETF pays a dividend, we must go into every account and spend that cash. We do it because this approach improves investor outcomes with better trade execution and lower taxes over time.

This information is educational and does not intend to make an offer for the sale of any specific securities, investments, or strategies.  Investments involve risk and, past performance is not indicative of future performance. Return will be reduced by advisory fees and any other expenses incurred in the management of a client’s account. Consult with a qualified financial adviser before implementing any investment strategy.